AstroKobi
Space · Astronomy · Wonder
missionsMonday, June 22, 2026·14 min read

The International Space Station and Tiangong: Two Decades of Life, Science, and Sanitation in Orbit

Explore the International Space Station and China's Tiangong, humanity's orbital outposts. Discover how astronauts live, conduct science, and manage daily life, including waste, in the unique…

A mesmerizing view of the Milky Way galaxy and countless stars in Gnadenwald, Austria.
Photo: Markus Partoll

For over two decades, the International Space Station (ISS) has served as humanity's continuous outpost in low Earth orbit, a testament to international collaboration and scientific ambition. More recently, China's Tiangong space station has joined it, establishing a parallel orbital laboratory. Both stations provide unparalleled platforms for scientific research in microgravity, pushing the boundaries of human knowledge and technological innovation, while also presenting unique challenges for the daily lives of their crews, from conducting experiments to the fundamental necessities of sanitation.

What happened

Humanity's presence in low Earth orbit is currently defined by two operational space stations: the International Space Station (ISS) and the Tiangong space station. Each represents a monumental achievement in space engineering and international (or national) cooperation, providing unique laboratories for understanding the universe and our place within it, while simultaneously navigating the intricate challenges of sustaining human life far from Earth.

The International Space Station, a marvel of global partnership, is operated by five partner space agencies: NASA (United States), Roscosmos (Russia), ESA (Europe), JAXA (Japan), and CSA (Canada). Since its first module launch in 1998 and continuous human occupancy beginning November 2, 2000, it has hosted the longest uninterrupted human presence in space, with 290 individuals from 26 countries having visited. Orbiting approximately 400 kilometers (250 miles) above Earth at 7.67 kilometers per second, it completes 15.5 orbits daily, offering a unique perspective below the Van Allen radiation belts and most space debris. The ISS is an immense structure, measuring 109 meters (358 feet) with its solar arrays and 73 meters (239 feet) in length, comparable in size to a full-sized football field. Its pressurized internal volume of 1,005 cubic meters (35,491 cubic feet) is similar to a Boeing 747 airliner, providing ample space for its rotating crews and extensive scientific equipment. The station is modular, divided into the Russian Orbital Segment (ROS) and the US Orbital Segment (USOS), and comprises 16 major pressurized modules within its total of 43 different modules and elements. These modules support diverse functions, from scientific research and crew habitation to storage and spacecraft control. Crews arrive via Soyuz and Crew Dragon spacecraft, while cargo is delivered by Progress, Cargo Dragon, Cygnus, Automated Transfer Vehicle, and HTV-X. Originally conceived as a laboratory, observatory, and factory, the ISS has expanded its roles to include commercial, diplomatic, and educational purposes, serving as a critical platform for scientific research in microgravity, studying the space environment, and preparing for future deep-space missions. Current plans project its operation until the end of 2030, with parts potentially transitioning to Axiom Station and the Russian Orbital Service Station, though a proposal to park the station in a higher, more stable orbit has garnered congressional support as an alternative to de-orbiting.

In parallel, China operates its Tiangong space station, officially the China Space Station (CSS), which has been in low Earth orbit since 2021. Tiangong represents China's third space station and its first permanently crewed one, operated by the China Manned Space Agency (CMSA). Its development followed China's formal request to join the ISS program in 2007, which was prohibited by the United States' Wolf Amendment in 2011. This spurred China to develop its independent capabilities, gaining crucial experience with Tiangong-1 and Tiangong-2 for rendezvous, docking, and long-term life support. Tiangong is the third modular space station in history, after Mir and the ISS, with its core module Tianhe launched in April 2021, followed by experiment modules Wentian and Mengtian in 2022. Orbiting at an altitude of 340 to 450 kilometers (210 to 280 miles), Tiangong has a pressurized volume of 340 cubic meters (12,000 cubic feet), about one-third that of the ISS. It hosts experiments in bioastronautics, microgravity, materials science, and space technology, with research involving scientists from 17 countries. Crews of three travel via Shenzhou spacecraft for missions of about six months, with temporary six-person crews during handovers. Cargo missions use Tianzhou spacecraft. Notably, Tiangong is the first crewed spacecraft to use ion thrusters for orbital station-keeping and relies on the Tianlian satellite network for communications. Since its first crewed mission, Shenzhou 12, in June 2021, and continuous occupation beginning with Shenzhou 15 in November 2022, the station has seen 21 spacecraft dockings and its crews have conducted 24 spacewalks, including a record-breaking nine-hour EVA in 2024. A space telescope, Xuntian, is scheduled to launch in 2027 and will periodically dock with Tiangong for servicing and refueling, further expanding its scientific capabilities.

One of the most fundamental yet often overlooked aspects of daily life in microgravity, shared by both the ISS and Tiangong, is the challenge of sanitation. In a weightless environment, fluids distribute uniformly around the human body, prompting a physiological response that necessitates frequent urination shortly after entering orbit. Consequently, the space toilet becomes one of the first devices used by astronauts. Unlike terrestrial toilets, space toilets rely on airflow to direct liquid and solid waste into appropriate receptacles, preventing it from floating freely. This air is then filtered to control odor and remove bacteria before being returned to the cabin. Modern systems are designed with ergonomics in mind, featuring automatic airflow activation upon lifting the lid and corrosion-resistant parts to minimize maintenance. Astronauts use a specially shaped funnel and hose for urine and a small, pointy seat for bowel movements, designed to provide ideal body contact in microgravity, ensuring waste goes where it should. Both can be used simultaneously, a design improvement based on feedback from female astronauts. Foot restraints and handholds are crucial for stability, replacing cumbersome thigh straps. Toilet paper, wipes, and gloves are disposed of in water-tight bags. Solid waste is compacted into removable canisters, with a small number returned to Earth for evaluation, while most are loaded onto cargo ships that burn up upon re-entry. Though currently, fecal waste is not processed for water recovery, NASA is actively studying this capability to enhance sustainability for future long-duration missions. The basic components include a liquid-waste vacuum tube with detachable urine receptacles (gender-specific), a vacuum chamber with clips for waste collection bags, waste storage drawers for urine, and solid-waste collection bags made of a special fabric that allows gas to escape while containing liquids and solids.

Why it matters

The existence and operation of the International Space Station and the Tiangong space station hold profound significance, touching upon scientific discovery, geopolitical dynamics, the future of human space exploration, and the very practicalities of extended human presence beyond Earth. These orbital outposts are not merely technological marvels; they are crucibles for understanding, collaboration, and adaptation.

Scientifically, the microgravity environment offered by these stations is an irreplaceable laboratory. Researchers conduct experiments across a vast array of disciplines, from fundamental physics and materials science to biology and human physiology. Studying the effects of microgravity on the human body, for instance, is critical for mitigating health risks associated with long-duration missions to the Moon or Mars, such as bone density loss, muscle atrophy, and fluid shifts. This research directly informs countermeasures and life support system development. Beyond human health, microgravity allows for the growth of purer crystals, the study of combustion without convection, and unique insights into fluid dynamics, all of which have potential applications for new materials and industrial processes on Earth. As observatories, the stations also provide platforms for Earth observation and astronomical studies, free from atmospheric distortion.

Geopolitically, the ISS stands as a powerful symbol of international cooperation, born from the convergence of previously planned U.S. and Soviet stations. It has fostered decades of collaboration among nations that might otherwise have been rivals, demonstrating that complex, high-stakes endeavors can transcend political boundaries. This diplomatic role is invaluable, promoting peaceful engagement and shared scientific goals. Conversely, Tiangong represents China's independent and rapidly advancing space prowess, developed in response to its exclusion from the ISS program. Its existence underscores a shift towards a multi-polar space landscape, where national strategic interests increasingly drive space initiatives. While Tiangong has hosted researchers from 17 countries, it also signifies China's capacity to lead its own space endeavors, potentially fostering new avenues for international collaboration or competition in the future. The training of astronauts from Hong Kong, Macau, and Pakistan for Tiangong missions further highlights its role in expanding China's influence in space.

The future of human spaceflight is inextricably linked to the lessons learned from these stations. They serve as essential testbeds for technologies and operational procedures required for missions beyond low Earth orbit. Developing robust life support systems, including advanced waste management and water recovery (like NASA's ongoing research into processing fecal waste for water), is paramount for self-sufficiency on lunar bases or Mars missions. The commercialization efforts, such as Axiom Space's planned module for the ISS and the potential for parts of the ISS to form new commercial stations, indicate a growing trend towards private sector involvement, which could accelerate innovation and reduce costs for future space endeavors. The debate surrounding the ISS's de-orbiting versus parking it in a higher orbit also highlights the growing awareness of space as a finite resource and the need for sustainable practices.

Finally, the mundane yet critical aspects of daily life in space, such as sanitation, profoundly impact crew well-being and mission success. The ingenuity required to design a functional space toilet underscores the immense engineering challenges involved in making space habitable. Without effective waste management, long-duration missions would be untenable, impacting astronaut health, morale, and the overall scientific output. The continuous refinement of these systems, driven by astronaut feedback, ensures that human physiological needs are met, allowing crews to focus on their primary scientific and exploratory objectives. These seemingly small details are fundamental building blocks for humanity's grander aspirations in space.

+ Pros
  • Unparalleled Scientific Discovery: Space stations provide a unique microgravity laboratory for breakthroughs in medicine, materials science, and fundamental physics, impossible to replicate on Earth, directly benefiting humanity.
  • Catalyst for International Cooperation: The ISS exemplifies how diverse nations can unite for complex scientific and engineering endeavors, fostering diplomatic ties and shared progress in space exploration, while Tiangong expands the global reach of space research.
  • Advancement of Human Spaceflight Capabilities: These orbital outposts serve as critical testbeds for long-duration human presence, developing life support systems, mitigating health risks, and refining operational procedures essential for future deep-space missions to the Moon and Mars.
Cons
  • Immense Cost and Operational Complexity: Building, maintaining, and resupplying space stations requires colossal financial investment and intricate logistical coordination, making them among the most expensive human endeavors.
  • Geopolitical Tensions and Duplication: The existence of parallel space stations, partly driven by geopolitical factors like China's exclusion from the ISS, can lead to duplication of effort and potential for strategic competition rather than unified global progress.
  • Health Risks and Environmental Challenges: Long-term exposure to microgravity poses significant health risks to astronauts, requiring extensive research and countermeasures. Additionally, managing waste and mitigating space debris around these stations present ongoing environmental and safety concerns.

How to think about it

When considering the International Space Station and Tiangong, it's crucial to view them not just as isolated engineering feats, but as dynamic, evolving ecosystems that reflect humanity's aspirations, ingenuity, and challenges in space. Think of them as living laboratories, where every component, from the largest solar array to the smallest waste collection bag, is a critical part of a grand experiment. These stations are simultaneously instruments of scientific discovery, proving grounds for future deep-space missions, and intricate social environments where people from diverse backgrounds must co-exist and collaborate under extreme conditions.

One framework for understanding these stations is through the lens of human adaptation and sustainability in extreme environments. Every aspect of daily life, from eating and sleeping to personal hygiene and waste management, has been meticulously re-engineered to function in microgravity. The space toilet, for instance, isn't just a convenience; it's a testament to the engineering required to maintain habitability and prevent contamination in a closed system. Its evolution, driven by astronaut feedback for better ergonomics and efficiency, highlights the iterative nature of space technology development. This constant adaptation to the unique challenges of space—be it radiation exposure, psychological stress, or the physical demands of microgravity—provides invaluable insights for designing future habitats on other celestial bodies, where self-sufficiency and resource recycling will be paramount.

Another perspective is to consider the balance between collaboration and national strategic interests. The ISS stands as a beacon of international partnership, demonstrating what can be achieved when nations pool resources and expertise. It's a model for how complex scientific and exploratory goals can transcend political divides. However, the development of Tiangong, partly in response to geopolitical exclusion, underscores that national sovereignty and strategic independence remain powerful drivers in space exploration. This dual approach presents both opportunities and challenges: opportunities for diverse scientific perspectives and technological competition that can spur innovation, but also challenges in coordinating efforts and avoiding redundancy. Understanding this dynamic is key to appreciating the broader geopolitical landscape of space exploration.

Finally, reflect on the long-term vision for human presence in space. These stations are not ends in themselves but stepping stones. The research conducted on them—from understanding the effects of microgravity on the human body to testing advanced life support systems—directly informs the design of future lunar outposts, Mars missions, and even potential space colonies. The discussions around the ISS's end-of-life, whether through de-orbiting or repurposing, highlight the need for sustainable practices in space, including managing orbital debris and considering the long-term utility of existing infrastructure. These orbital outposts are preparing humanity for a future where living and working beyond Earth is not just a dream, but a tangible, sustainable reality.

FAQ

How do astronauts manage daily life and hygiene in microgravity aboard space stations?+
Astronauts adapt to microgravity through specialized equipment and routines. For basic needs like eating, food is often rehydrated and consumed with utensils that adhere to magnetic surfaces, while drinks are consumed from sealed pouches. Hygiene involves sponge baths using minimal water and special no-rinse soaps and shampoos, as traditional showers are impractical. Waste management is highly engineered, using airflow to guide urine and feces into specialized receptacles within space toilets, which are designed for optimal contact and waste containment in zero-G. All waste, including solid waste and used hygiene products, is carefully collected, compacted, and either stored for return to Earth or disposed of via cargo spacecraft that burn up upon re-entry.
What are the primary scientific contributions and research areas of space stations?+
Space stations serve as unique microgravity laboratories, enabling research across diverse fields. Key scientific contributions include extensive studies on human physiology in space, providing critical data on bone density loss, muscle atrophy, cardiovascular changes, and radiation effects, all vital for long-duration missions. Materials science benefits from the absence of convection, allowing for the growth of purer crystals and novel alloy development. Biological research explores plant growth, cell behavior, and microbial adaptations in space. Physics experiments investigate fluid dynamics, combustion, and fundamental forces under conditions impossible to replicate on Earth. Additionally, the stations serve as platforms for Earth observation, climate monitoring, and astronomical studies, offering unique vantage points above the atmosphere.
What is the future outlook for space stations after the International Space Station's planned retirement?+
After the ISS's planned operational end around 2030, the future of human presence in low Earth orbit will likely involve a combination of existing and new platforms. China's Tiangong space station is already fully operational and expected to continue for years, potentially expanding its international research collaborations. Commercial space stations, such as those planned by Axiom Space (which intends to attach modules to the ISS and eventually operate independently), are also emerging as key players, aiming to provide research, manufacturing, and even space tourism services. Furthermore, there is ongoing discussion about the possibility of repurposing parts of the ISS or moving it to a higher, more stable orbit rather than de-orbiting it. These developments suggest a diversified future for orbital habitats, driven by both national strategic interests and commercial ventures, ensuring humanity's continued presence in space.
Sources
  1. 01International Space Station
  2. 02Tiangong space station
  3. 03Space toilet
Keep reading